Tuesday, April 23, 2013

In Defense Of Rahul Gandhi...

                                                                                             

My subjective evaluation of him hinges to a large extent on the first memory of seeing him on television. It was during his grandmother’s funeral and Rahul Gandhi was 14 years old at that time. He was standing next to his younger sister in front of the funeral pyre. I don’t think the enormity of what had happened had sunk in for both of them.

Their cousin Varun was a toddler at that time. Maneka Gandhi had made a dramatic exit from the Gandhi household along with her infant son after her husband’s death and ensured the press had arrived at an opportune moment to capture the family feud on camera. Maybe Rahul and Priyanka had slept through the entire sorry episode.

As soon as Varun arrived with his mother, a smiling Priyanka forgot the seriousness of the situation and ran to hug her cousin while Rahul looked on indulgently. Neither of his parents had made a foray into politics at that time. And it was evident to the entire nation that both the children had been brought up well. The poison of broken relationships had not afflicted them.

I would notice him again, seven years later. At the funeral of his father, looking distraught. Trying to come to terms with yet another blow life had dealt him.

It can be argued that both his grandmother and father had fallen victim to their own political machinations. It’s no secret that Indira Gandhi had created the Frankenstein of Bhindranwale and the entire tragedy leading to the storming of the Golden Temple and her subsequent gunning down by her bodyguards felt like a vicious circle. But is it fair to expect two children barely in their teens to understand all this? They had lost their doting grandmother in the most brutal manner.     

Rajiv Gandhi too meddled unnecessarily in Sri Lanka and earned the ire of Tamil separatists. It was to cost him his life and come as a lesson to the entire nation that unleashing violence always begets violence. It’s a self defeating process.

While Rajiv Gandhi was as culpable in the genocide of Sikhs in 1984, as Narendra Modi was in the genocide of Muslims in 2002, there has not been one irresponsible communal statement from Rahul Gandhi in all the years he has been dabbling in politics. He has been raised by a mother who was raised Catholic. I don’t think Hindu fundamentalism makes any sense to him.  

It is easy to ridicule Rahul because of his perceived failures, especially in UP. But that may very well be the plight of any decent person who ventures into politics. He is as clueless as you and I. It is also apparent that if it was not for his mother, he would not be playing the political role assigned to him currently.

That’s very Indian. Mothers being pushy, that is. One more reason most men in the country should have empathy for him. And did he lose to a better man in UP? Look at how that state is turning out to be under Akhilesh Yadav and his party of goons?

I am surprised at how many rude jokes there are about Rahul Gandhi. Have any of us ever tried to place him in the context of the violence and trauma he has gone through while he was growing up? Just because he comes from a privileged background does not mean he is immune to the pain of losing loved ones to bullets and bombs. Maybe his reticence is because of all the tragedies he has encountered in his life. He comes across as a decent person and I think we need decent people in politics. Rahul Gandhi does not scare me.

Narendra Modi scares me.

After Manmohan Singh made public his intent of wanting to run for office for a third time at the ripe age of 81, he too has started scaring me.

Advani scares me.

Sushma Swaraj scares me.

Mulayam Singh Yadav scares me.

Mayawati scares me.

All of them behave as if they could do anything to stay in power.  

Rahul Gandhi does not give me that impression. He seems to be indifferent and that’s what I like about him. As far as I am concerned, he is one of the two candidates who should be our next Prime Minister.

Nitish Kumar is the other one. 

Monday, April 22, 2013

The League of Extraordinary Actors

                                   

The Delhi Police Commissioner Neeraj Kumar missed his vocation in life. He should have been a performer. From what little we can make out from his wooden expression, whenever he appears on television to participate in well orchestrated press conferences, he would have turned out to be a terrible actor. But how does that matter? Many hams have made it big in Bollywood.

In the aftermath of the gang rape in December, he donned a Shakespearean avatar and waxed eloquent- ‘There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune.’ Considering the backdrop was a brutal rape and murder, the quote from Julius Caesar was singularly misplaced in the context. What could be fortuitous in such a deplorable situation, after all?

If Kumar wanted to communicate it takes the inhuman rape and murder of an innocent to change the virulent anti women ethos of a city, then surely he could have found a more appropriate quote from literature to express himself. But maybe it was just a Freudian slip. He was perhaps talking about his good fortune to have escaped unscathed after the bungling by his men. By now the country is well aware how callously the policemen on duty behaved when they came across the victim and her friend lying bleeding and naked on the street after they were thrown out of the moving bus by the rapists. Precious time was lost as they quibbled between themselves about registering the case and taking the victims to the hospital.

Last week his men demonstrated once again that the police force in Delhi can put to shame the most brutal criminals the country has produced, especially when it comes to crimes against women. A policeman of the stature of an ACP slapped a young woman protester. Not once but three times and stopped only when he literally tasted blood.

An ACP is not a semi literate constable. At the very least he must have a college degree. But when has education prevented men in our country from committing crimes against women. I am sure if this man had no shame in publicly slapping a young girl, he must also be tormenting the women in his family. They ought to be given security. But maybe not, because the men guarding them would be culled from the same police force that delights in unleashing batons and water cannons on women who dare to protest.

This time, after the rape and battery of a five year old, Kumar dumped Shakespeare for a lame Bollywood type of dialogue. He mentioned he will resign a thousand times if that would prevent rapes. He thinks he is being clever and cute. That if he made statements like these, the rest of us would sagely agree with him and run to hug him.

Unfortunately, even the most naive among us know this is not about logic. We don’t want him out because we believe the rapists and molesters would tell themselves now that Kumar has resigned, let’s turn into saints. Why would they? The perverts in this country are well aware the men in uniform are like their mirror images. That it is not uncommon for them to molest women in their custody. .

But yes, if Kumar is asked to be accountable for the shameful behavior of his men towards rape victims and women protesters, the message may go home that it is the collective responsibility of the entire force not just to prevent these crimes but also to respond with sensitivity whenever such a crime is committed.

The problem is who is going to bell the cat. Kumar is not the only high profile actor we have in Delhi. So are all the politicians in power. From Pranab Mukherjee to Manmohan Singh. From Sonia Gandhi to her philosopher son. From the Home Secretary to the Congress Spokesperson. All of them make these moving statements every time a new unimaginably horrific crime surfaces and then get back to doing what they are doing. Which from whatever evidence the rest of the country has, seems to be nothing. There is no governance to speak of. The capital of India where all of them live has turned out to be a torture chamber for little children.

If Kumar has plans to go back to Shakespeare, he need not look beyond Macbeth. It is bloody enough to serve his purpose.

And I think Manmohan Singh would be outstanding as King Lear.  

Vijay Nair

    

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Pittsburgh 12


the young tell me their stories about crust punks
and cults, the edge, food not bombs,
bands from the past and eating from the dumpsters

there is one in the Strip where they throw
chocolate fudge sometimes, a young woman
reports somewhat disinterestedly over dinner

a stray memory rests over the leftover food
and i want to know from her whether she
wants to die before she turns 30, the familiar story

of the need to escape before you travel the world
hope for love at least in tea spoons and learn to
separate the art of existing from disenchantment

not wanting to confront the day when friends stop
talking because of things they never cared about earlier
the wisdom of keeping faith in long never ending treks

the aversion towards finite milestones to measure
all that was lost on the way; the unspoken fear
of a child when the sudden storm blows the fuse

spring arrives before the question could be posed

Vijay Nair

Monday, April 1, 2013

Pittsburgh 11


You can play this game,

be as patronizing as you want to be
affect that tone and pretend my words
don’t reach you, practice the cultural deception
with ease, be close and distant in turns,
hide behind niceties and talk about the weather,
make me understand your ways to hurt are more
subtle, and that the difference lies in the degrees
of havoc we are both capable of wrecking on this world

I know
I understand
I comprehend sometimes
the distance between us
is no wider than the floating clouds
I spy from my window some days

*

If we meet on a sunday afternoon
on familiar roads we have walked
together and separately, with no place
to hide, no boundaries to retreat
we may discover the restlessness in
our eyes struggling to get the words out

what was the point in creating an elaborate
charade of stories with guns and violence
how did it help this bleak barren landscape
to know we are just as likely to sin like our
fathers and that it was useless to imagine a
world ruled by the mythical phoenix

You can play this game.

Thursday, March 21, 2013

And Justice for All?- An Open Letter to Justice Katju

                   

Dear Justice Katju,

I belong to the 90% in India who you think of as ‘fools’ and I need some lessons from you. You are a legal luminary and held office as a much revered Judge of the Supreme Court of India, so please let me know on what grounds should the Governor of Maharashtra pardon Sanjay Dutt while the co- accused in the case who seem to have committed lesser crimes be subjected to much more stringent punishments under TADA?

I hope you know that the last public figure to declare Dutt to be innocent was the late Bal Thackeray. The same political hotshot from Maharashtra whose followers decided to ruin the lives of two young girls for posting something really innocuous on Facebook about his death. You used every opportunity to condemn the police for foisting that laughable case on them. But the case against Dutt is not so laughable.

Sanju Baba as an adult did what he did to facilitate a terror attack that killed more than 250 innocent people because as he claimed, he had Muslim blood in him and the only way to quell the rage within was to get together with the underworld and settle scores with the fundamentalist Hindus who guided by Thackeray had incited violence against the Muslims. The tiny detail about terror being blind and in a city like Bombay there is no way to ensure only members of a particular community get killed in these dastardly attacks must have escaped him. Did he think only the Hindus would die in those attacks? Why?

As you have rightly pointed out 90% of us Indians are fools and Dutt seems to have done far worse considering how he has been living his life. Poor little Sanju Baba.  He is in his mid 50s, father of three kids and he has expressly forbidden the oldest among them from joining the profession that made his lineage special. So special that a legal brain like you has written to the Governor seeking a pardon. Wow!

Do you know Dutt thinks acting is not a good profession for girls? What are your views on the subject? I think he may have a point there. His actor and politician father is revered as almost a saint after his death. But you must ask a dancer and activist from Ahmedabad why she never acted in a Bollywood film after her debut venture with the same saint. She would tell you a few stories about the sexual harassment faced by her. So maybe the son was not so foolish in forbidding his daughter from making a career in the film industry.

Let’s get back to Thackeray and why he decided to give a clean chit to Dutt publicly. Do you think it was because Dutt had a Hindu father and Thackeray being the patriarch he was believed Dutt was a Hindu too. Only misled by his Muslim relatives.

I am sure your reasons for seeking pardon for Dutt are very different. I hope you are going to seek pardons for all his co-accused in the case, too. I understand there was a 64 year old woman among them whose crime is made out to be less serious than Dutt and she was imprisoned under the draconian TADA. Because if you don’t do that, the saffron brigade is going to call you names like pseudo secularist.

Maybe they are right. Maybe that is what all of us who like to display our secular credentials are. Pseudo.  Look how strongly we feel for Sanju Baba. Poor fellow! Hasn’t he suffered enough in the past 20 years, marrying some three times, partying with his friends, allegedly having long interesting conversations with Chotta Shakeel and asking the support of his underworld mentor to discipline a fellow actor Govinda because the latter made the cardinal sin of making Dutt wait for him during the shooting of a film they did together.

I get it now. Dutt falls in the category of the other 10% that you belong to. He is canny and smart as hell, isn’t he? When it suits him, his Muslim blood takes over and when it is convenient he wears the large Tilak on his forehead, the mark of any self respecting Hindu, and attends his court hearings. He  runs with the hares and hunts with the hounds. Just like someone we know. When it suits him, he airs all his disgruntlement against Narendra Modi and when it is convenient, he writes a letter to the Governor seeking pardon for the same man who had the unflinching support of Bal Thackeray.

There is only one small glitch in all this and this foolish man is going to point it out to you. I hope you wrote that letter in your personal time and not when you were at work in your official capacity. If not, I along with 90% of my foolish countrymen will grin and bear it. But you know Arvind Kejriwal and the rest of the civil society activists who like you and Dutt belong to the 10% intelligentsia, may not. They are very picky and righteous about corruption and it’s a long time since they had a worthy cause.

I am rambling like the imbecile I am who belongs to the rest of the 90%. Why should an intelligent man like you care? But no harm in trying. 


Ever Faithfully,

Fool          

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Kai Po Che and My two visits to Ahmedabad in 2002

There is something very different about watching a Bollywood film in an American multiplex. And when the film is Kai Po Che which is not run of the mill despite adhering to mainstream trappings, the experience acquires many more hues. The Abhishek Kapoor helmed venture can very well be the Dil Chahta Hai of the current decade, with politics aspiring to replace mushy romance in the film.

The work is also a timely reminder about the injustice literary critics have been heaping on Chetan Bhagat.  By dismissing him and his writing. Pardon the French, but Bhagat is the first Indian novelist in English to have the balls to write about the Gujarat genocide; while the so called serious literary writers who often make themselves heard through their opinion pieces in Sunday supplements rather than through their books, have been busy churning out tripe about the same jaded middle class protagonist pining for her married lover.

Bhagat may have oversimplified the issue going by the film that’s based on his book but at least he has tried to say all the right things, using all the subversive means he has at his disposal as a writer. I haven’t read the book but I plan to, as soon I get back to India in June.

I loved Kai Po Che, as much for the refreshing cast of talented youngsters it has as I lauded it for its clever screenplay and nifty direction. It is an honest work. The only other recent Bollywood film that comes close is Kiran Rao’s Dhobi Ghat.

What the film also did for me was take me back to the two trips I made to Ahmedabad in 2002. The first one commenced before the Godhra tragedy happened and concluded on the day the state was erupting in the aftermath of the tragedy.

I had been invited to facilitate a Personal Growth Lab by a professor who taught in one of the most reputed management institutes of India. I had a lot of respect for her at that time. The Lab was to be conducted in a resort in Rann of Kutch, but the group of facilitators first met in Ahmedabad, and we drove to Kutch from the capital of Gujarat.

The resort was owned by a Muslim family and the Professor pretended to be great friends with them. They, on their part, plied her and the rest of us with hospitality and warmth. But something had already started happening to the mentor and protégé relationship I had shared with her.

At one time, I had been full of adulation for her but in that lab, all the chinks in her armour were suddenly visible. I discovered over one stray incident that something she had shared with me was a big lie and the lie was not about something inconsequential, although it did not directly affect me. But there is something about making heroes out of ordinary mortals. The moment you discover they have feet of clay, you tend to give up on them. However the big disenchantment was yet to happen.

We drove back to Ahmedabad after the lab got over and discovered a very different city from the one we had left behind only a week ago. The news about Godhra came to us in bits and pieces and afterwards we also got to hear about the systematic targeting of Muslims that had started to happen in few localities. The professor dropped her priceless gem- ‘They should all be burnt alive,’ and as it turned out the mobs in Ahmedabad proceeded to do just that, with the connivance of the authorities and the politicians.

I never met the Professor again.  Instead I gave fictional personas to all the process workers I had worked with until then, and created my first novel around their stupidities. All of them must have recognized themselves in the book and they stopped talking to me. Which was just as well because after that lab I decided I didn’t want to be a process worker and began the rewarding journey as a playwright and a novelist. I met some real intellectuals who were very different from a bunch of fakes, spouting silly jargons and playing mind games with gullible participants in their labs.

One Process Worker decided to confront me after the book was published and challenged me that if I had real courage I should attend a lab with all those I had unflatteringly fictionalized present and then say all the things I had said about them in my novel. 

I burst out laughing and asked him whether he hadn’t come across the wisdom that the pen is mightier than sword.  I also added I may be brave, but not stupid to walk into a gathering of bigots with my eyes open only to get lynched by them. They were welcome to visit me in my house singly or in small groups and I would engage with them with utmost sincerity. None of them took me up on my offer.  Thankfully, I have no friends among process workers anymore and I lead a happier life.

The detail about the process workers is important because it was a psychological test designed by a process worker for a leading Design School in India, once again located in Ahmedabad that took me back to the city in a matter of months. The test was an extremely dubious instrument and despite being trained to administer and interpret it, those of us who were considered experts in the area knew that our interpretation was extremely subjective and there was nothing to tell whether the instrument was actually delivering. But those were early days of my consulting career and I wasn’t thinking beyond the prestige of being in the interview panel of this reputed institute.  

It was a long assignment running into two weeks in the month of May. My role in the panel was to ask a few questions to the candidates based on my interpretation of the test.  The riots were supposedly over by then but the city still had curfew in the evenings in many areas. I was part of a large panel that comprised mostly of faculty members from the institute. There was just one outsider other than me in the panel, an alumni of the institute who ran a highly successful design company in Bangalore. Apart from being smart, she was also very attractive.

For me, she held additional interest because she was married to one of the best known establishment writers of Bangalore. I was just a couple of plays old in my writing career at that time  and renowned writers and anything to do with them held great charm for me.  

As it turned out the Design Professional from Bangalore was also a story teller. Except she told the same story, whenever we had a break from the interviews. About how a leading technology organization had hired her firm to design their logo. Her team had finally come up with something to please the client but one member of the board did not approve of it so the logo was dropped. But despite that little setback her firm had been paid a crore of rupees for designing something that was never used.

The story was somewhat tricky. I did not know whether I should make clucking noises of sympathy because the logo was never used or congratulate her as she and her firm got the humongous fees anyway. Because she was smart and successful and attractive, all of us in that panel smiled brightly at everything she said. Especially the men.

There was another exciting sideshow to the panel interviews. It had to do with one particular panel member who had been her professor when she was studying.  I have never seen a man behave more atrociously. He gazed at her adoringly all the time and every time she said something, he looked at all of us with barely concealed amazement, as if he was asking us if we have ever come across anything so celestial. He was most entertaining and I thought he had been imported directly from a Charles Dickens novel.

With so much going on, no one in the panel talked about the riots. Once I heard one of the members complain that a few areas under longer curfew regimen fell on the way to her house, so she had to take a more circuitous route. I guess that is how it works. The inconvenience of the affluent class is always more important than the fear and insecurity of those living in poorer neighbourhoods.

I was staying in the institute guesthouse and one night I woke up to the sounds of howling followed by screams of a mob. At first I thought I had imagined the whole thing but I heard the disturbing shouts and screams more clearly when I went and stood near the window. The next morning I brought it up with the caretaker while waiting for my breakfast and he told me although the riots were supposedly over, there were stray incidents of individuals from the minority community being hounded and burnt alive.  Just as I was trying to digest the news of someone being burnt alive in the scorching heat of May in Ahmedabad, he added sagely ‘They have to be taught a proper lesson. Otherwise they will never learn.’  I got up without eating and decided I would complain about the caretaker to the panel when I met them.

But when I entered the room, most of the panellists were already there and the Design Professional had once again started telling her story of the logo. I gave up and turned listless for the rest of the day. The Chairman of the panel who I believed to be a very benign and kindly gentleman noticed my restlessness and asked me if I was alright. I told him I was missing my family in Bangalore and that was true. When I can’t handle something and my family is not with me, it just makes it worse.

He invited me to his house for dinner the next day. Both he and his wife were extremely hospitable. When we were done with the main course and his wife went into the kitchen to get the dessert, he asked me once again what was bothering me and I told him about the conversation with the caretaker.

‘It is not his fault,’ said the genial man. “In this area, there were only a few of them. But now as you can see, so many of them have built such large houses. They are getting the money from across the border for spying on us.’

I couldn’t believe my ears. I thought I had enough and told him that it was terrible on his part to harbour such communal feelings. He is an educator and so his views were even more distressing. It must have been frustration that gave me the courage that evening. I even refused the dessert his wife got.

I try to be very correct on social occasions so I was pretty surprised at how stubborn I turned as a guest in someone else’s house. He dropped me to the guest house soon after that but things turned really frosty between us on that hot and sultry Ahemdabad evening.

I somehow got through the two remaining days of the panel interviews and flew back home. They didn’t ask me the following year and I think the year after that, the new Director of the institute decided to remove the psychological test altogether from the selection process.

I went to Ahmedabad once again the following year. But this time, it was with a play I wrote and directed to raise awareness about Autism. We performed at Natrani a theatre run by Mallika Sarabhai, a dancer and activist. She had steadfastly opposed the state sponsored violence against the minority community at the risk of her personal safety and security. She had lived under constant threats and many of her friends in the city had deserted her because she had taken on Narendra Modi. I was really happy during that trip because our theatre group was performing in that secular space. To date, I consider it to be the best theatre where our group has performed.

Kai Po Che took me back to all those memories.               


    

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Pittsburgh 10


We are waiting,
the river and I
to get acquainted

There have been days
of temptation when I
wanted to take the
steps and go down

Walk by its side, all the
way to the prison, that
stands waiting and weary,
if I trek long enough with
an enthusiastic friend

The intimidation is not
from the bars, not even
the cold, although one
morning, pausing on the bridge,
I prayed for the glitter of
sun on its grey stillness

But no, not for this river
the religion that makes
water pompous in
some familiar lands

It has turned into a recluse
content to wash away
this jaded baggage of  turmoil.